Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.
48% Yes |
52% No |
48% Yes |
52% No |
See how support for each position on “Social Media Regulation” has changed over time for 6.3k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Social Media Regulation” has changed over time for 6.3k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9K99V29 2wks2W
Yes, as long as it's only shared with regulators and not the public except in the cases of harm or abuse
@9MNGKL21wk1W
No, but if it's a threat to the common safety or the nation, then allow it.
@9N295MR 5 days5D
No, but there should be at least some type of change in transparency especially with TOS in most cases like this b/c they tend to make their TOS super long purposefully so you don't read it. It should be required to be simplified to 1 page so that everyone who buys their product understand their rights throughly.
@9MXQBBM6 days6D
Big tech should not be allowed to manipulate the public, or hinder the rights to free speech based on their corporate leaders own beliefs.
@9MXMZZP6 days6D
There needs to be a system of checks and balances to ensure the 1st amendment is protected and that big tech is not using their power to sensor people they disagree with.
@9MWX9T37 days7D
Companies should disclose the intentions of their algorithms without giving away technical information.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
