Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MMMR35 from Idaho answered…2hrs2H

No, this is a violation of the search-and-seizure article of the Constitution, which is a good article. Everyone should…

 @9MMMR35 from Idaho answered…2hrs2H

Yes, but. The President is the Commander-in-Chief of the US Military, they need to be allowed some amount of leeway to u…

 @9MMJGLG from North Carolina answered…6hrs6H

yes if you cant arrest the man first and we know he is going to do something then you can assassinate

 @9MMJ4ZX from Hawaii answered…7hrs7H

I think Congress and the president should be able to authorize military force against Al-Qaeda. If they are not in sync,…

 @9MMHBFP from Florida answered…8hrs8H

depends on the reliability of the AI, and if that is the most feasible investment to make

 @SenBR2003from New York  answered…9hrs9H

Yes, but AI must first be used in a pilot project to give a clearer idea how it may affect our military capabilities.

 @9MM9WHV from Indiana answered…14hrs14H

Yes but only admissible in court for serious charges including rape, murder and terrorism

 @9MM99YL from Hawaii answered…14hrs14H

First is important invest in cyber security and how viable it would be use IA

 @9MM8JHR from New York answered…14hrs14H

If it has been decided by congress that a certain entity is at a high enough risk to US national safety, the president s…

 @9MM7NMZ from Minnesota answered…15hrs15H

I think it again would be good to incorperate ideas of an artificial intelligence program, but I don't think we should b…

 @9MM6MM3 from California answered…16hrs16H

No, facial recognition can be altered and copied so it is unsafe for it to be relied on or used.

 @9MM6MM3 from California answered…16hrs16H

No, artificial intelligence isn't completely accurate and it shouldn't be something that is relied on.

 @9MM6FRH from Illinois answered…16hrs16H

Not unless the AI itself is impartial in who/what it targets.

 @9MM5RTJ from Minnesota answered…16hrs16H

They should slowly integrate the idea into public life before fully committing to using facial recognition.

 @9MM5PH4 from New Jersey answered…16hrs16H

Yes, but increase oversight with strict regulations.

 @9MM585G from PR answered…16hrs16H

We should invest in AI but we have to give access to people who actually want to better certain aspects of the world and…

 @9MM4BH6 from California answered…17hrs17H

Only when AI has reached a certain level of sophistication.

 @9MM3ZSD from Texas answered…17hrs17H

it could help catch criminals but also to track every day people so idk.

 @9MM3SKF from North Carolina answered…17hrs17H

The gov should work with the leadership of the nation in question to capture, interrogate, and imprison.

 @9MM2W57 from California answered…18hrs18H

Yes but only in dire circumstances, like after a crime or during an investigation

 @9MM2TV7 from Texas answered…18hrs18H

Its giving to much physical information to those that arent facing criminal charges

 @9MM2TC5 from California answered…18hrs18H

In some certain circumstances for example (Boston marathon) Incase of an emergency it could be helpful to have some tech…

 @9MM2TC5 from California answered…18hrs18H

I feel like it should be private companies that are doing the research, so that there will be more job openings in that…

 @9MLZRDV from New York answered…19hrs19H

Maybe, If its built for it it could be good but it could malfunction

 @9MLZQLY from Washington answered…19hrs19H

Ai can be lethal, in terms of defense i support certain aspects but any control over said defense is uncomfortable.